Reach without a dependable enquiry path
The May audit identified weak downstream intent, fragmented boosting and gaps in conversion tracking.
CERAMIC PRO CHENNAI / JUNE TO AUGUST 2026
I led the performance marketing rebuild for a premium automotive protection studio, connecting search, creative and local discovery to a website designed to qualify enquiries.
Strategy, website CRO, qualification logic, tracking, paid media and creative direction.

Three times June’s tracked job count in August.
THE THREE-MONTH OUTCOME
Total reported revenue · June–August 2026
As stated in the August report ↗BUILT. REFINED. CONVERTED.
From the website and qualification flow to paid media and creative, I connected the work to the sales pipeline.
August report’s three-month summary. Monthly reports use different revenue bases; see the source note below.
Explore the monthly results ↓01 / THE STARTING POINT
Ceramic Pro Chennai already had an established Instagram audience and visually strong automotive content. The opportunity was to turn that interest into a measurable path to enquiries, quotations and studio jobs.
The May audit identified weak downstream intent, fragmented boosting and gaps in conversion tracking.
Vehicle type, service choice and price expectations needed to reach the studio before the sales conversation.
Platform events, captured leads and confirmed jobs were different measures. The lead register became the bridge between demand and sales.
02 / HOW I BUILT IT
Select a stage to see the decision and what it changed.
I audited the existing content, audience and boosted activity, then mapped the gaps between attention, tracking and a sales-ready enquiry.
A SWOT audit, audience priorities and a phased acquisition plan with lead quality as the operating focus.
Source: May SWOT audit and June groundwork report.
03 / WEBSITE + QUALIFICATION
The form begins with the vehicle, presents relevant protection options and makes pricing visible before the visitor proceeds. It gives a premium-price buyer a clear route forward and offers a separate budget-options route.
I connected the funnel to lead capture and conversion tracking. The June report documents GTM, Google Ads tagging, Meta Pixel, Conversions API and the lead-quality sheet, with final tracking fixes completed in July.
The screenshots show the implemented form. Displayed prices belong to that captured version.
My focus was to bring relevant vehicle owners into the pipeline and surface intent and budget early. Some opportunities were lost on price or other sales factors. The registers also include uncontacted and no-response leads, so captured leads are not presented as a 100% verified qualification rate.
04 / THE RESULTS
AUGUST / CREATIVE FOCUS
Meta consolidated into one campaign. Lead volume fell from 116 to 90, while tracked jobs rose from 6 to 9. The winning educational creative gave the next round of production a clear direction.
| Metric | June | July | August |
|---|---|---|---|
| Captured leads | 71 | 116 | 90 |
| Tracked jobs, headline series | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Business Profile impressions | 2,738 | 3,123 | 3,982 |
| Call-button clicks | 82 | 122 | 112 |
| New Google reviews | 9 | 9 | 13 |
July’s ₹9.02L total includes ₹5.62L from July leads and ₹3.40L from June leads that closed later. This is the clearest example of pipeline value extending beyond the month of acquisition.
05 / CREATIVE THAT INFORMED THE MEDIA
The August report identifies “What is Ceramic Coating” as the leading ad: 36 reported leads from 380 clicks, with a 1.22% CTR. I used that signal to guide PPF explainers, coating comparisons and price-objection content.
Customer stories and installation footage supplied trust. Search captured active demand, while Meta and retargeting gave interested viewers more reasons to enquire.
Explore all 9 Ceramic Pro films ↗
Selected films from the creative collection. The report’s winning-ad result is shown separately because its ad ID has not been matched to an uploaded file.
06 / LOCAL DEMAND + OWNED CHANNELS
Google Business Profile impressions grew from 1,680 in May to 3,982 in August. Call-button clicks moved from 64 to 112, with a July peak of 122.
I worked on service listings, model-specific content and the review-response process. These actions supported local intent and the route to a studio visit. The reports measure discovery and contact actions, not confirmed walk-in attendance.
Videos live, June to August. The August report records 11,889 cumulative views.
Launch date in the August report, with a verified website and service-focused boards.
August views, up 24% from June’s 91,697. The established account existed before the engagement.

THE CONTRIBUTION
The work combined a clearer website, early price qualification, structured acquisition, educational creative and local trust. The monthly reports show growing tracked job counts and a pipeline that continued to close after the first enquiry.
Sources: May 2026 SWOT audit; June 2026 report, slides 3–10; July 2026 report, pages 2–8; August 2026 report, including its three-month summary; supplied website and Business Profile screenshots. Role and website authorship are provided by Arun Prasath.
277 is the sum of 71, 116 and 90 captured leads. Platform lead events are not added to those totals. The 3, 6 and 9 job series uses the reports’ repeated headline counts. This does not establish a same-month lead cohort conversion rate.
June’s ₹2.8L is an estimate in its report. The August report later lists June at ₹2.35L and July at ₹5.62L. July’s own report itemizes ₹9.02L including ₹3.40L from earlier leads. The ₹16.53L headline is the three-month revenue total stated in the August report’s “Since takeover” summary. Its retrospective breakdown is ₹2.35L + ₹5.62L + ₹8.56L. This is a reported total, not a reconciled sum of the three original monthly reports. The ₹3.40L from June-origin leads is already included in July’s ₹9.02L and is not added again.
August also mentions six additional coating jobs, 15 total jobs and a 17% rate. Nine divided by 90 is 10%; 15 divided by 90 is about 17%. Those bases are inconsistent, so the case uses the nine itemized jobs and omits a conversion-rate headline. Their listed values sum to ₹8,56,500; the report displays ₹8.56L.
Order value is not net profit, and cost data is insufficient to establish profitability or ROAS. Call clicks are not confirmed visits. The reports contain unworked leads, so a universal qualification claim cannot be established. Planned audit tactics are distinguished from actions documented in later reports.